In induction furnaces working face of the main crucible is lined with a suitable ramming mass. Furnace performance is directly related to the lining performance. Well-stabilized lining results in smooth working of furnace, optimum output and better metallurgical control. The lining practice best suited to particular foundry will depend upon the furnace capacity and design, metal being melted and output etc.
Comparison Manual Lining V/S Lining Using Vibrator | ||
Sr. No. | Manual Lining | Using Lining Vibrator |
1) | Lining life is inconsistence & shorter. | Consistent and improve lining life |
2) | Unpredictable production | Predictable and increased total output tonnage |
3) | Density of Lining is not uniform throughout the shell. | Density of lining is uniform throughout the shell. |
4) | Lining thickness is not uniform throughout the shell. | Lining thickness is uniform throughout the shell. |
5) | Lots of hazardous silica & dust in the air | Pollution free |
6) | whole process is time consuming | Whole process of lining is completed in 2-3 hours. |
7) | Trouble due to human component like attitude, error & fatigue. | Smooth and trouble free operation |
Machine Model : | ||
SM Model | Capacity (Furnace) | Vibrator |
VE LV 01 | 500 Kg-1.5 TON | 2 Arm Vibrator |